US Government Asks Court to Seal Vaccine Records

Reuters Health – Attorneys for the Bush Administration asked a federal court on Monday to order that documents on hundreds of cases of autism allegedly caused by childhood vaccines be kept from the public.

Department of Justice lawyers asked a special master in the US Court of Federal Claims to seal the documents, arguing that allowing their automatic disclosure would take away the right of federal agencies to decide when and how the material should be released.

Attorneys for the families of hundreds of autistic children charged that the government was trying to keep the information out of civil courts, where juries might be convinced to award large judgments against vaccine manufacturers.

The court is currently hearing approximately 1,000 claims brought by the families of autistic children. The suits charge that the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine, which until recently included a mercury-containing preservative known as thimerosal, can cause neurological damage leading to autism.

Federal law requires suits against vaccine makers to go before a special federal “vaccine court” before any civil lawsuit is allowed. The court was set up by Congress to speed compensation claims and to help protect vaccine makers from having to pay large punitive awards decided byjuries in state civil courts. Plaintiffs are free to take their cases to state courts if they lose in the federal vaccine court or if they don’t accept the court’s judgment.

The current 1,000 or so autism cases are unusual for the court.
Because it received so many claims, much of the fact-finding and
evidence-gathering is going on for all of the cases as a block.
Monday’s request by the Bush Administration would prevent plaintiffs
who later go to civil court from using some relevant evidence generated
during the required vaccine court proceedings.

Plaintiffs’ attorneys said that the order amounted to punishment of
the families of injured children because it would require them to incur
the time and expense of regenerating evidence for a civil suit.
“Wouldn’t it be a shame if at the end of the day our policy would be
to compensate lawyers,” said Jeff Kim, an attorney with Gallagher Boland
Meiburger & Brosnan. The firm represents about 400 families of autistic
children who received the MMR vaccine.

Kim accused the government of trying to lower “a shroud of secrecy
over these documents” in order to protect vaccine manufacturers, who he
said were “the only entities” that would benefit if the documents are sealed.
While federal law clearly seals most documents generated in
individual vaccine cases, it has never been applied to a block proceeding like the one generating evidence in the autism cases.

Administration lawyers told Special Master George Hastings that they
requested the seal in order to preserve the legal right of the Secretary
of Health and Human Services to decide when vaccine evidence can be released
to the public.

Justice Department attorney Vincent Matanoski argued that to let
plaintiffs use the vaccine court evidence in a later civil suit would
confer an advantage on plaintiffs who chose to forgo federal compensation.

“There is no secret here. What the petitioners are arguing for are
enhanced rights in a subsequent civil action,” Matanoski said of the
plaintiffs. “They’re still going to have unfettered use within the proceedings.”

Hastings would not say when he would issue a ruling on whether to
seal the court documents, but did say that his decision would be “very prompt.”